BEYOND CORRELATION: ENHANCING CURRENCY PORTFOLIOCONSTRUCTION THROUGH KENDALL’S TAU ANDCORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS
Keywords:
Kendall correlation, correspondence analysis, portfolio optimization, financial dependence, risk-adjusted performance, Spearman, Pearson, drawdown controlAbstract
Traditional correlation metrics such as Pearson and Spearman are widely employed in financial portfolio construction, yet they exhibit critical limitations. Pear- son correlation, being linear and sensitive to scale and volatility, often overstates de- pendency during high-variance periods, while Spearman correlation fails to capture non-monotonic relationships. In this paper, I advocate a shift from classical cor- relation analysis to a correspondence-based perspective, employing Kendall’s Tau as a more robust and semantically consistent measure of dependency. I demonstrate, through a portfolio optimization framework, that Kendall correlation yields superior results in terms of return maximization and drawdown minimization, particularly under conditions of structural market changes and nonlinear dependencies. Empirical results on historical asset data reveal that portfolios constructed using Kendall-based correspondence measures exhibit enhanced stability and riskadjusted performance compared to those based on conventional correlations. This work highlights the importance of re-evaluating correlation paradigms in favor of more meaningful statistical dependence structures in financial modeling.
References
1. Ang, A. and Chen, J. (2002). Asymmetric correlations of equity portfolios. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(3):443–494.
2. Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues.
3. Quantitative Finance, 1(2):223–236.
4. Demarta, S. and McNeil, A. J. (2005). The t copula and related copulas. International Statistical Review, 73(1):111–129.
5. Embrechts, P., Lindskog, F., and McNeil, A. (2001). Modelling Dependence with Copulas and Applications to Risk Management. Department of Mathematics, ETH Zurich.
6. Embrechts, P., McNeil, A. J., and Straumann, D. (2002). Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond, pages 176–223.
7. Forbes, K. J. and Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market comovements. The Journal of Finance, 57(5):2223–2261.
8. Gençay, R., Selçuk, F., and Whitcher, B. (2001). Scaling properties of foreign exchange volatility. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 289(1–2):249–266.
9. Greenacre, M. (1984). Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. Academic Press.
10. Greenacre, M. (2017). Correspondence Analysis in Practice. CRC Press, 3rd edition.
11. Huang, W., Vodenska, I., Havlin, S., and Stanley, H. E. (2019). Topological dependency networks for financial time series. Quantitative Finance, 19(9):1429–1440.
12. Joe, H. (1997). Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts. Chapman and Hall/CRC. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1):77–91.
13. Myers, J. L., Well, A. D., and Lorch Jr, R. F. (2010). Research Design and Statistical Analysis. Routledge.
14. Nelsen, R. B. (2007). An Introduction to Copulas. Springer Science & Business Media.
15. Patton, A. J. (2006). Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. International Economic Review, 47(2):527–556.
16. Patton, A. J. (2012). A review of copula models for economic time series. Journal of Multivariatse Analysis, 110:4–18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Advances in Applied Mathematics and Computing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.