4E ANALYSIS OF CONVERTING A HEAVY WATER REACTOR TO A LIGHT WATER REACTOR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63456/jsegt-2-2-65

Keywords:

Heavy water reactor, light water reactor, reactor conversion, thermohydraulic analysis, nuclear economics, IR-40 reactor, nonproliferation, JCPOA, pinch analysis

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the modifications required to convert a heavy water reactor (HWR) to a light water reactor (LWR), with specific focus on the IR-40 research reactor design. The conversion process is examined from technical, thermohydraulic, and economic perspectives, providing a holistic understanding of the challenges and opportunities involved. The thermohydraulic analysis reveals significant differences in heat transfer characteristics, flow behavior, and thermal limits between heavy water and light water systems, necessitating careful redesign of cooling systems and operating parameters. A novel pinch analysis methodology is applied to optimize heat exchanger networks and minimize energy consumption in the converted system. The economic assessment indicates that conversion costs range from $65-200 million depending on the approach taken, with a half-power (20 MWt) conversion representing the most balanced option at $85-140 million. Comparative analysis with international reactor conversion projects validates the proposed methodology and cost estimates. While the conversion does not present a positive financial return based solely on operational savings, it provides a path forward those balances nonproliferation objectives with the preservation of valuable nuclear infrastructure. This analysis offers valuable insights for similar conversion projects worldwide, contributing to global efforts to reduce proliferation risks while maintaining the beneficial applications of research reactors.

References

[1] Kemp, R. S. (2015). Two Methods for Converting a Heavy-Water Research Reactor to Use Low-Enriched-Uranium Fuel to Improve Proliferation Resistance After Startup. Energy Technology & Policy, 2(1), 39–46.

[2] International Atomic Energy Agency. (2015). Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. IAEA, Vienna.

[3] Institute for Science and International Security. (2019). Parsing Iran's Claims about Quickly Reconstituting the IR-40. ISIS Reports.

[4] World Nuclear Association. (2020). Nuclear Power Reactors. Information Library.

[5] International Atomic Energy Agency. (2006). Thermophysical properties database of materials for light water reactors and heavy water reactors. IAEA-TECDOC-1496.

[6] International Atomic Energy Agency. (2002). Heavy Water Reactors: Status and Projected Development. Technical Reports Series No. 407.

[7] Ahmad, A., et al. (2015). Neutronic analysis for nuclear proliferation resistance of CANDU spent fuel. Science and Global Security, 23(1), 20–37.

[8] Willig, T. M., Futsaether, C., & Kippe, H. (2012). Converting the Iranian Heavy Water Reactor IR-40 to a More Proliferation-Resistant Reactor. Science and Global Security, 20(2), 97–116.

[9] International Atomic Energy Agency. (2002). Research reactor core conversion guidebook. IAEA-TECDOC-643.

[10] U.S. Department of Energy. (2018). Preliminary Analysis of a Light Water Ingress Accident for the French High Flux Reactor. ANL/GTRI/TM-14/15.

[11] Linnhoff, B., & Hindmarsh, E. (1983). The pinch design method for heat exchanger networks. Chemical Engineering Science, 38(5), 745–763.

[12] Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., & Moran, M. (1996). Thermal Design and Optimization. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

[13] Smith, R. (2005). Chemical Process Design and Integration. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

Jamalabadi, M. Y. A. (2026). 4E ANALYSIS OF CONVERTING A HEAVY WATER REACTOR TO A LIGHT WATER REACTOR. Journal of Sustainable Engineering & Green Technologies , 2(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.63456/jsegt-2-2-65